Source by http://www.Laptop-akku-shop.De/ : The retired IBM executive who led the Apple-Samsung jury planning held in attendance was veto single witness before case of evidence with the purpose of led to the panel’s decision to settlement Apple $119.6 million taking part in indemnity.
“It’s the collection of everything we were exposed to seeing that evidence taking part in the box,” foreman Thomas Dunham held on Monday, speaking outside the courtroom taking part in San Jose.
Dunham held the biggest revelation of the trial was probably with the purpose of Google had agreed to indemnify Samsung on next to slightest a join of the patents next to distribute taking part in the box.
“I think it woke us all up,” Dunham held. However, he and other jurors held with the purpose of Google’s role was not a dynamic taking part in the decision on infringement before the amount of indemnity ultimately awarded.
“Not next to all,” Dunham held.
A different juror, Pamela Sage, agreed.
“It was exciting, but it didn’t conversion several of our opinion,” Sage held. “It didn’t conversion our decision-making taking part in several way.”
Seeing that to how it unwavering the amount of indemnity, Dunham held the jury wasn’t looking to transmit a message, but more exactly simply to settlement reasonable indemnity.
“The indemnity were based on the information with the purpose of both sides presented their look at of what did you say? A reasonable amount of, I suppose, compensation would be real,” he held. “We didn’t really feel either solitary was what did you say? We felt was a rational and definitely compensation.”
Taking part in the opening, a number of jurors had senior impairment awards taking part in mind and a number of drop, held juror Margarita Palmada, who declined to say what did you say? Individuals amounts were.
“At the opening we happening with sundry amounts, but with the purpose of was part of the process,” Palmada held.
Seeing that representing the misunderstand with the purpose of sent the jury back representing an added two hours of planning, Dunham called with the purpose of a “clerical error” with the purpose of involved putting the sin against come to into a join of the boxes.
Dunham, who has worked restoring classic British cars since retiring from IBM, held he is in view of attractive a consultant representing patent issues certain his experience, firstly next to IBM and without hesitation taking part in the jury scope.
“I kind of feel like I won the lotto,” Dunham held.
He held he did look forward to with the purpose of the parties might get a way to settle their disputes, aphorism with the purpose of consumers are the ultimate losers taking part in patent battles seeing that the engineers with the purpose of create products are affected to splurge count with lawyers.
“It takes a share not permitted of your development team,” he held. “When you are pulling your means wand not permitted, they are not burden the things they are designed to be real burden and ultimately with the purpose of reflects taking part in what did you say? We predict seeing that consumers on the shelves. … So yeah, I’d like to predict them get a way to settle, but we’ll predict. I look forward to with the purpose of this taking part in a number of way helps appearance with the purpose of coming.”
Dunham and Sage held they and the other jurors worked well seeing that a team and with the purpose of apiece portion brought a unique perspective.
“We all brought something sundry with the purpose of we heard taking part in the testimony,” Sage held. “We definitely wanted to build a rational decision. I think seeing that a team we worked very well all together. We all respected apiece other.”
Dunham held with the purpose of the jury went finished all the evidence and used the phones and medicine with the purpose of were made open seeing that exhibits.
“We went through them all,” he held. “It was a rigorous week. We not here veto gemstone unturned — made a share of relatives delay, I think, but what time you are conversation a propos with the purpose of kind of money and with the purpose of kind of bang [you] need to achieve a very thorough chore,” he held.
Dunham acknowledged he had the the majority wisdom of the patent technique.
“I definitely happened to be real a ringer,” Dunham held with a laugh.
没有评论:
发表评论